What AI moving survey software costs

Four shapes of price exist in this category, and they are not comparable to each other. Per survey, where HomeSurvey.ai charges $20 and gives you the first ten. Per job, where Voxme charges $300 a year plus $3 a job. Flat monthly, where MoveBlueprint Survey is $99 with surveys unmetered and Virtual Moving Technologies is $99 self-run or $297 for the AI to run it. Per user, where LiveSwitch starts at $299 a month for two seats and rises with headcount.

Six of the 14 publish nothing: Yembo, SmartMoving, Movegistics, Supermove, ComeHome.ai and Qubesheets. Their pricing question ends at a demo booking, so a mover cannot line them up against anything without spending an hour on a call first.

That imbalance is the reason $20 is the number quoted back at you everywhere. It is not the category price. It is the price that was legible to a machine.

Tools whose main job is turning a customer's home into an inventory. Four of the eight publish a price.

The other way movers buy this is inside a CRM, either as an included feature or as an add-on. The survey is rarely priced separately here, which makes the plan price the only number you can actually compare.

Same question, run through each published model. Ten surveys is a small operation quoting a couple of jobs a week. Fifty is a busy month.

Two things fall out of that table. Metered pricing wins at low volume and loses quickly: at $20 a survey the crossover against a $99 flat plan lands around 5 surveys a month, and by fifty it is a $900 gap. Volume packs soften the curve without changing its direction.

The second is that a CRM price and a survey price answer different questions. If you already run a CRM you are comparing a survey against a survey. If you are replacing the CRM too, the $289 to $599 tier prices are the honest comparison, and the survey inside them is worth checking rather than assuming.

A per-survey price does something a spreadsheet does not show. A mover paying by the survey rations them. Links go to the leads that already feel likely, and the rest get quoted over the phone from a room count, which is the habit the software was bought to end. Every survey you decide not to send is a job priced on a guess.

A per-user price has the mirror version of the same problem. It taxes the office growing, and it pushes a shop toward one shared login, which is how audit trails and permissions quietly stop meaning anything.

Flat pricing is only better if the plan covers the part of the job you need, which is where the number stops being the interesting part.

Two tools at the same number can leave you in different places. The question worth asking is what happens after the inventory exists. With HomeSurvey.ai the quote, the signature and the deposit live in Movegistics, so the survey tends to bring a CRM with it. Virtual Moving Technologies sells the survey as a service, including a tier where their own team runs it. MoveBlueprint carries the reviewed inventory into a quote at your own rates, or pushes it into the CRM you already run.

Our own split sits on that line: Survey at $99 covers the AI video survey, the inventory your team reviews and the instant-quote widget. Complete at $199 adds quotes at your own rates with e-signature and deposits, plus pipeline, messaging and dispatch. Flat, month to month, with a 14-day free trial.

Six of these will not tell you a number until you book. That is a sales choice, not a verdict on the product, but it does mean the first five minutes of the call are worth spending on this list rather than on the feature tour.

• Is the meter surveys, users, jobs or seats, and what happens to the bill in a busy August.
• Does the quote the customer signs come from this tool, or from a CRM I also have to buy.
• What is the contract length, and what does the price do at renewal.
• Is the AI survey included in the plan you just quoted me, or is it a line item on top of it.
• What does onboarding cost, and is training billed separately.
• If I leave, do I get my inventory data and my customer records out, and in what format.

Each vendor's own pages were read on 2026-08-15, starting at the pricing page where one exists and the homepage where it does not. Published prices are quoted as written. Where nothing is published, the entry names the pages that were checked instead of asserting the absence from one glance, because a price can sit on a product page, a calculator or a footer link.

Third-party figures are labelled as third-party. Two tools here have ranges circulating in software listings and review posts, and a reported range is a different kind of fact from a page the vendor wrote. Both are useful. Presenting one as the other is how a comparison page ends up wrong about a real company, so they are kept apart on purpose.

Prices move, and several of these moved during 2026. The page carries the date it was read and gets re-read rather than quietly edited. If you find one out of date, send the vendor's page and it gets corrected with a new date.